No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
Business & Technology
SUBSCRIBE
  • .
  • Thought Leadership
  • Conversations
  • International Voices
  • News
  • Wealth
  • Digital Transformation
  • Lifestyle
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
  • .
  • Thought Leadership
  • Conversations
  • International Voices
  • News
  • Wealth
  • Digital Transformation
  • Lifestyle
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
No Result
View All Result
Biztech Asia
Home Thought Leadership

Fiscal deficit reduction – is there a magic number?

by editorial
03/11/20
in Thought Leadership
3 min read
0
Fiscal deficit reduction – is there a magic number?

By Jason Loh Seong Wei, Head of Social, Law & Human Rights at EMIR Research.

Covid-19 has reignited that never-ending debate on the effectiveness of fiscal policy versus monetary policy in times of economic crises and doldrums. By extension, one of the burning issues arising from this is the level of the fiscal deficit which has to do with government spending as well as revenue such as tax receipts.

For most countries, including here in Malaysia, there is the settled recognition that fiscal policy – particularly in view of the looming Budget 2021 – has to do more even if fiscal consolidation (which means fiscal reduction) as the desirable goal still has to come in the medium-term.

Fiscal consolidation in general itself (let alone trying to target a specific figure) will be very difficult to achieve should – and let’s assume for the sake of argument that – the scenario of a bleak and gloomy economic outlook is to be on-going and persist.

The irony is that trying to achieve fiscal consolidation prematurely might result in having to postpone it to the long-term or until such time when circumstances are more propitious.

We are told that good fiscal practice dictates that the government reduces its fiscal deficit down to the three percent threshold of the GDP, e.g. 3.3%, at least as the target in the long-term.

Historically, by 1983, Malaysia’s fiscal deficit was the highest at 18% and reduced to 5% in 1988 and finally to 1.9% by the peak of the Asian Financial Crisis (1998) and then spiked to 6.6% in 2000 only to be brought down to 5.3% in 2002.

In 2007, the budget deficit was at 3.2% before hitting 7% in 2009 during the Global Financial Crisis/GFC (2008-2009). It was 2.9% of the GDP in 2017 before resetting to 3.7% in 2018. Our fiscal deficit was reduced to 3.4% of the GDP in 2019.

As it is, Finance Minister Tengku Zafrul Abdul Aziz has said that our fiscal deficit would hit 6% by end of the year.

It could be argued that the 3% fiscal rule has its origins in the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) of the European Union (EU). In turn, the SGP which emerged out of the Maastricht Treaty 1992 enshrined two requirements: (a) a debt to GDP ratio below 60%, or converging towards it; and (b) a budget deficit below 3% of the GDP.

The 3% fiscal rule was imposed in order to fulfil those two “pre-conditions” and was to apply regardless of the context, i.e. the business cycles of member-states.

The context for the “prototype” of the 3% fiscal rule was the monetary union (eurozone) and the preoccupation with the need for very low inflation levels. However, the reason why 3% is the chosen number has neither been satisfactorily explained nor justified.

Intriguingly, leading member-states such as Germany (early 2000s) and France (late 2000s) have themselves been consistently guilty of breaching the fiscal rule – for the sake of their own economies, no less!

In the wake of the GFC (2008), Greece would stand out as the opposite example where a primary budget surplus was imposed (i.e. revenue before debt servicing is taken into account).

So, instead of a 3% budget deficit, Greece was expected to achieve a budget surplus which was 4.14% in 2019. So, no magic number here – of a fiscal deficit despite the need for some form because of the on-going economic conditions.

That is, of high and crippling private sector debt, currency misalignment whereby the Greek euro was overvalued and the nexus between private and public debt. Alongside that was, of course, austerity (internal devaluation) such as wage and pensions cuts. The result was economic contraction by 26% of real GDP in 2017 and high (especially youth) unemployment rates in double digits.

The inexorable logic here would be that – going by the empirical evidence – there couldn’t be a magic number. This is so since by definition the situation presupposes and implies that the 3% fiscal threshold and rule is the embodiment of economic and financial stability and growth.

In our own case, fiscal consolidation towards 3.4% saw the GDP for Q4 of 2019 grew by 3.6% below the annual of 4.3% and only 0.7% for the Q1 for this year. So, there’s much space for the threshold in terms of fiscal consolidation to be increased from 3.4%.

This is particularly in view of the need to prepare policy thinking for continuous budget deficits above the recommended 3 percent threshold and rule that we have been so accustomed in the past decades or so.

Furthermore, given the current Covid-19 epidemic’s impact on the economy, it’s hereby urged that the threshold of fiscal deficits should be regarded as neither good nor bad. That is, the threshold by itself says nothing as to the effectiveness and relevance of the fiscal deficit at this time of economic uncertainty and despair.

To quote from the late Keynesian economist, Gardner Ackley, who had proposed that fiscal and monetary policies must be mustered to fine-tune the market as it is not self-correcting:

“My own position on deficits has always been, and remains, that deficits, per se, are neither good nor bad. There are times when they are not only appropriate but even highly desirable, and there are times when they are inappropriate and dangerous. During a recession or a period of “stagflation”, deficits are nearly unavoidable, and are likely to be constructive rather than harmful”.

To add, higher fiscal deficits – even if understood as temporary, targeted and timely – can be justified in the name of the economics of empathy.

Previous Post

What the war between Alibaba and Tencent says about strategy

Next Post

Uncertainty prevails in markets

editorial

editorial

Related Posts

Are bad PCR practices churning out false positive Covid-19 cases?
Thought Leadership

A vaccination race between nations can have no winners

The Big Picture: Boats afloat
Thought Leadership

The Big Picture: Boats afloat

Comprehensive measures required to win Malaysia’s pandemic war
Thought Leadership

Comprehensive measures required to win Malaysia’s pandemic war

IKEA fits in a world that wants to buy less, says Ingka Group’s CEO
Thought Leadership

IKEA fits in a world that wants to buy less, says Ingka Group’s CEO

The how of adopting blockchain route for the halal meat industry
Thought Leadership

The how of adopting blockchain route for the halal meat industry

How to build more resilient countries after the COVID-19 pandemic
Thought Leadership

How to build more resilient countries after the COVID-19 pandemic

Next Post

Uncertainty prevails in markets

China’s Dual Circulation Pivot

Is a Biden win or Trump win good for Asian markets?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Recommended Stories

Retirement Planning 101 – What are the basics you need to start financial planning for retirement

Personal Finance Show: What do you really need to know about buying personal insurance?

Banish red tape and immigration issues, then investors will flock to Malaysia!

Banish red tape and immigration issues, then investors will flock to Malaysia!

Optimism amid new focus on sustainable investing

Optimism amid new focus on sustainable investing

Popular Stories

  • Economic recovery: an elusive thought?

    Economic recovery: an elusive thought?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Cannibalising your business can be profitable

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Sexual fulfillment builds confidence and well-being

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Tech Stocks – Ant gets stomped on but REITS offer stability amid volatility

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Singapore REITS and China tech stocks – Which should you buy?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

About Us

A Business and Technology digital publication that engages business leaders in business and technology conversations to help everyone pivot, adapt, and thrive in these turbulent times.

LEARN MORE »

Contact Us

Phone: 016-2011 050

Email: editor@biztech.asia

Address:
Level 18, Boutique Office 1 (B01-C)
Menara 2, No. 3, Jalan Bangsar,
KL Eco City, 59200, Kuala Lumpur.

Email Newsletter

Loading

© 2020 Business & Technology - made possible by Milestones Digital.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Thought Leadership
  • Conversations
  • International Voices
  • News
  • Wealth
  • Digital Transformation
  • Lifestyle
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
  • Login
  • Sign Up

© 2020 Business & Technology - made possible by Milestones Digital.

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Facebook
Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Facebook
Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms bellow to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?

You have successfully subscribed to the newsletter

There was an error while trying to send your request. Please try again.

will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to provide updates and marketing.